Hi,
It is not unreasonable to expect, with something that you purchase, AutoPPP
to work in Red Hat 5.1, in what is nearly the last quarter of 1998.
regards,
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark F. Burgo ( Mark F. Burgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Ready <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Philip A.
Prindeville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, September 18, 1998 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: #include files in 2.3.5
>While RedHat may not be standard and is rather annoying at times it is the
>simplest and most usable out of the box. I also get upset with the way
things
>are setup at times, most of all when I need to upgrade a package and no RPM
is
>avaiable. And there is no reason that RedHat could not go through and re
>configure the RPM's to conform to the natural locations for files. However
>don't knock a system unless you can create a better system. They are
widely
>used and again I can upgrade without need to re format my disk and re setup
all
>my software. This is the key, they are not always upto date and may have
some
>holes that need patched but it is resonably priced and allows for the
upgrades
>that others haven't allowed for. I still use RedHat and I also use find
and
>grep alot when problems arise but my system also run with little trouble
and
>are a snap to maintain....
>
>Mark
>On 16-Sep-98 David Ready wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I couldn't get it to compile either with RedHat 5.1 and mgetty AutoPPP
>> doesn't work in ANY configuration with RH 5.1
>>
>> RedHat sux bad.... there is so much different that "normal out of the
box"
>> linux and there are few to no tips on http://redhat.com
>>
>> I will never use RedHat again. There is no point. There is too much
hassel.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> David
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philip A. Prindeville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 5:13 PM
>> Subject: #include files in 2.3.5
>>
>>
>>>Does anyone know why the files in ppp-2.3.5 in the include/linux/
>>>directory (which should be symbol links to the same ones in the
>>>linux/) are completely out of sync with their counterparts in
>>>include/net? The dates and version numbers of these files are
>>>significantly different.
>>>
>>>And pppd/sys-linux.c is including "linux/ppp_defs.h" but I suspect
>>>that this should be "net/ppp_defs.h" instead, shouldn't it?
>>>
>>>In any case, I couldn't get ppp-2.3.5 to compile out of the box
>>>on Redhat 5.1 (Linux 2.0.34).
>>>
>>>-Philip
>>>
>>>-
>>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
>>>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
>> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>----------------------------------
>Burgo Systems / Consulting
>E-Mail: Mark F. Burgo ( Mark F. Burgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://www.surfshop.net/users/mfburgo/pub
>
>Date: 16-Sep-98
>Time: 08:18:57
>
>This message was sent by XFMail
>On RedHat Linux 5.0
>Burgo Systems / Consulting is happy to preload Linux on your new
>BS/C System, Factory Direct
>----------------------------------
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
