On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, winfried szukalski  wrote:
> I had used SuSE Linux 6.1 until Xmas 1999. Then I installed 
> SuSE Linux 6.3.

Were you on the full version ? I have the 6.1 snapshot,
and there are differences. The 'snapshot' provides a base system on one
cd, but I've had trouble with odd things, not a few of them in the
'usr/include' directory.

 > 
> With v6.1 I compiled pppd-2.3.10 and pppd-2.3.11 sucessfully.
> With v6.3 I compiled pppd-2.3.11 sucessfully.
> 
> I could send you the patch file I use with SuSE and PPPD.

That would be great - I might actually GET somewhere.
> 
> What I do not understand: your error message points to
> >/usr/include/resourcebits.h:103: warning: `RLIM_INFINITY' redefined
> 
> but the patch of Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is for
> >/usr/include/bits/resource.h
> 
> Supposed you have inserted your v6.1 CD1 in '/cdrom':
> 
> mount /cdrom
> lynx /cdrom/INDEX.gz
> 
> Search for 'resourcebits':
> 
        I tried this: lynx gave me about four error messages and then
started loading this file, which is as large as the Bible. In the full
version, INDEX.gz gives every file. (I checked from my 5.3 set). I have
their 6.1 snapshot; INDEX.gz gives every package on all 6 cds. A better
way to do the above is with zgrep, surely?

zgrep resourcebits /cdrom/INDEX.gz; (I mastered this E V E N T U A L LY)

> ./CD6/usr/include/resourcebits.h
> Now search for 'bits/resource':
> You will not find something. 
> '/usr/include/resourcebits.h' is in YOUR distribution.
> '/usr/include/bits/resource.h' is in Graham's distribution.
> And in my distribution. And I could compile ppp-2.3.11 sucessfully.

        Right - I think I followed that, and it sounded meaningful. I
fired up KDE and did a search on the offending system under
/usr/include for resourcebits.h and resource.h. I found BOTH. Sorry
about the KDE, butI never got 'find' going - I told it to run updateb,
and all the rest but it never takes a blind bit of notice :-(. 

I did find:
/usr/include/sys/resource.h (3086 bytes)
/usr/include/resourcebits.h  (6045 bytes)

both alive, but not necessarily well. This area of the system is a real
pain.  Would a crafty symlink get me out of this?

mkdir /usr/include/bits
ln-s /usr/include/bits/resource.h  /usr/include/sys/resource.h

Whose patch should I be using then? Yours or Graham's

--
        Regards,

        Declan Moriarty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to