Clifford Kite wrote:
> |How come the receiving end doesn't view that package in the same way? Why
> |is the package treated as a bad one?
>
> I don't know the answer to either question and my C programming experience
> isn't enough to allow me to easily find the answers by looking at source
> code written at the level pppd is written. If you are able to modify the
> pppd 2.3.7 source then you may also be able to determine answers to these
> questions simply by reading the source code.
You are indeed a helpful person. If I would get the idea by simply
browsing the source code, why do think I waste days and time writing mails
to this list and to newsgroups? I post the questions because there are
other persons more skilled in these areas than I am, and it may give me
answers I otherwise have to spend a lot of time to get.
> I've had a moderate amount of programming experience in languages other
> than C and know that when you modify code, particularly someone else's
> code, then it is no longer the original.
I never said it was the original, I said it was edited all from the start.
> If you observe the same behavior
> with a pristine 2.3.7 then you'll know that the original is the source of
> the behavior and not in any way caused by the modifications you made.
What if the original code doesn't work in my system unmodifed due to
various reasons? Am I then a silly person to ask around if anyone knows
about details concerning this?
It is indeed very interesting to chat, but I was more in the mood of
getting some real information.
--
Daniel Stenberg - http://www.contactor.se/~dast - +46-705-44 31 77
ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
