Steve Egbert wrote:
> Encapsulation Summary Recap
> Type Network Itf ATM Itf Drivers Daemon SetupUtil
First, the "ATM Itf" part is redunant... ATM interfaces are only numbered
under linux-atm. They do not hav their own entity under ifconfig.
> 1483 CIP atm0 eni0 atm-0.77 atmarpd atmarp
> 1483 Bridge atm0? eni0 br2864 br2864ctl -
^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
Marcell's current code by default names interfaces "nas0". There might
be a better naming structure ("atmbr0"?)
> PPPoE ppp0 n/a pppoe pppd pppoe.o
> (plugin)
> PPPoA ppp0 n/a pppoa pppd pppoatm.o
> (plugin)
>
> Only shortcoming I see so far is that PPPoE cannot attach to "atm0" Unix
> network
> interface.
Do you mean that you're trying to run PPPoE over 1483-CLIP? That doesn't
make any sense since PPPoE needs an ethernet-like transport to funciton
and 1483-CLIP is not one. PPPoE-over-1483 always uses 1483-bridged.
> Are we supporting BOTH:
>
> 1. PPPoE attaching to atm0 Unix network interface and
> 2. PPPoE kernel hooking to the atm interface?
The idea is that the 1483-bridged interfaces will be similar enough to
ethernets that PPPoE (and whatever protocols.. IPX, DECnet, ...) will
be none the wiser.
-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]