Steve Egbert wrote:
> Encapsulation Summary Recap
> Type         Network Itf    ATM Itf     Drivers    Daemon    SetupUtil

First, the "ATM Itf" part is redunant... ATM interfaces are only numbered
under linux-atm.  They do not hav their own entity under ifconfig.

> 1483 CIP       atm0          eni0       atm-0.77   atmarpd   atmarp
> 1483 Bridge    atm0?         eni0       br2864     br2864ctl -
                 ^^^^                                ^^^^^^^^^

Marcell's current code by default names interfaces "nas0".  There might
be a better naming structure ("atmbr0"?)

> PPPoE          ppp0          n/a        pppoe      pppd      pppoe.o
> (plugin)
> PPPoA          ppp0          n/a        pppoa      pppd      pppoatm.o
> (plugin)
> 
> Only shortcoming I see so far is that PPPoE cannot attach to "atm0" Unix
> network
> interface.

Do you mean that you're trying to run PPPoE over 1483-CLIP?  That doesn't
make any sense since PPPoE needs an ethernet-like transport to funciton
and 1483-CLIP is not one.  PPPoE-over-1483 always uses 1483-bridged.

> Are we supporting BOTH:
> 
> 1. PPPoE attaching to atm0 Unix network interface and
> 2. PPPoE kernel hooking to the atm interface?

The idea is that the 1483-bridged interfaces will be similar enough to
ethernets that PPPoE (and whatever protocols.. IPX, DECnet, ...) will
be none the wiser.

-Mitch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to