Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:35:16 +1100 NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:+ for (i = conf->raid_disks ; i-- ; ) {That statement should be dragged out, shot, stomped on then ceremonially incinerated. What's wrong with doing for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++) { in a manner which can be understood without alcoholic fortification?
I don't find either hard to read, but you suggestion isn't equivalent, since it increments rather than decrements the index.
I admit I probably would write it the same way Neil did... -- bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
