I was wondering if there would be enough value in saving more
information out of 'check' to justify the effort of coding it.
Particularly in the area of faster repair. If the check operation
optionally left a bitmap of stripes which were bad, if the admin decided
that a repair was appropriate, then only the stripes identified by check
would need to be processed. Because of possible additional errors, etc,
that should be optional as well.
This opens the door to more intensive repair operations, such as voting
on more-than-two-way mirrors, and extensive test and try recovery on
RAID-6, where no read error is found but the data doesn't match. By
assuming chunks are bad, one at a time, a correct sector might be
identified and written back.
Note: this is just an idea at the moment, I'm just doing a feasibility
study here. ;-)
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
