Carlos Carvalho wrote:
Neil Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 21 January 2008 12:15:
 >On Sunday January 20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 >> A raid6 array with a spare and bitmap is idle: not mounted and with no
 >> IO to it or any of its disks (obviously), as shown by iostat. However
 >> it's consuming cpu: since reboot it used about 11min in 24h, which is quite
 >> a lot even for a busy array (the cpus are fast). The array was cleanly
 >> shutdown so there's been no reconstruction/check or anything else.
>> >> How can this be? Kernel is 2.6.22.16 with the two patches for the
 >> deadlock ("[PATCH 004 of 4] md: Fix an occasional deadlock in raid5 -
 >> FIX") and the previous one.
 >
 >Maybe the bitmap code is waking up regularly to do nothing.
 >
 >Would you be happy to experiment?  Remove the bitmap with
 >   mdadm --grow /dev/mdX --bitmap=none
 >
 >and see how that affects cpu usage?

Confirmed, removing the bitmap stopped cpu consumption.

Looks like quite a bit of CPU going into idle arrays here, too.

--
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to