Hi folks,
anyone care to guess how stable/useable this new ext2/ext3 filesystem is?
Where are the patches available, and has anyone actually used it successfully?
Thanks
Ricardo
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:58:07 +0000 (GMT)
A James Lewis wrote:
>
> I believe there are patches out there, but the general concensus is to
> call it ext3 to avoid unnecessary use of new code in a mission critical
> environment before it's fully stable.
>
> I think the patch instructions start with "cp -dpR fs/ext2 fs/ext3" or
> some such.
>
> PS. Although my name is James Lewis, I am not [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I
> wave at the person below who evidently is!
>
> On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Henrik Johansson wrote:
> >
> > > will be a journaling filesystem very soon. The way I remeber it, it's
> > > already there in the developer tree almost ready to launch. The guy in
> > > charge of it is called Steven Taylor if my memory serves me right, and
you
> > > can reach him at: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . I think he said it was ready to use
> >
> > That would be Stephen Tweedie. He was talking about this at least as
> > early as 5-98 at Linux Expo. What was said at Linux World?
> >
> > ----don't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
> > Jon Lewis *[EMAIL PROTECTED]*| Spammers will be winnuked or
> > System Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes
> > Atlantic Net | to get the job done.
> > _________http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key__________
> >
> >
>
> James ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Vortex Internet
> My operating system unders~1 long filena~1, and yours?
>
This message powered by EMUmail. http://EMUmail.com
