-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Performance is going to *suck* with 5 IDE disks, assuming of course you
can actually get 3 IDE controllers to work in the same box.  I guess the
question is what's more important?  

1)  Saving a few bucks

2)  Keeping your hair

:-)


- -- 
Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      | Check out the Red Hat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8


On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Jeremy Wohl wrote:

> Linux software RAID5 w/5 EIDE UMDA disks.  Crazy?
> 
> I assume the problem is getting io requests to occur simultaneously.  My
> surfing tells me most controllers provides poor same-channel access,
> yet independent channels.  So three controllers, one disk per channel
> would provide concurrent io's, if the linux eide driver makes use of
> them.
> 
> I'd appreciate any confirmation of this information.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> -jeremy
> 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNqO5FjM3jpXy1kJtAQESXgP+OW1q0qeg4YrOvN02V5sDIq7BkfB+h+g4
5oKt4BDddtRlrI7loiQtiAgW4R5iIBBpsDXs3SQcVQpbfwr3YMOgSB3+7/lO8C2E
r5M2FzBxYZUAnP1lbD6EcBAWllNSZwv7OA1SNqNVHfAQW80YP2WhakKXQB4Kp8Xk
Om+dYJFfxZs=
=17uQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to