hi aaron

> Not sure if this is a RAID issue, but I'm running out of things to blame
> it on.
> 
> P2 450Mhz
> Genuine SymBios 53c895
> 2x Quantum Atlas III 9GB
> RAID 1 for all partitions except for swap
> 2.0.36 with raid0145-19990108-2.0.36
> RAID tools 0.90
> RH 5.2
> Execute an init 0 or init 6 and it starts the shutdown process.  The last
> lines it displays:
> 
> Stopping kernel services: kerneld
> INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel
> 
> And then it just hangs until I hit the reset button.  It then boots,
> fsck's all the partitions and then RAID sync's the secondary to the

the above might not be a raid problem....

what happens when you leave the raid drive unmounted....
( never mounted after reboots as if it never existed )
and than do your normal reboot, shutdown, halts etc... does it still hang ???

have fun
alvin

> master.  Luckly this doesn't seem to cause any corruption.  However since
> the machine is about a 45 minute drive away, its not very optimal to have
> to hit reset everytime I do an init 6 after a new kernel is compiled.
> 
> Thoughts anyone?  (raidtab/mdstat follow)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> - -- /etc/raidtab
> # Root paritition
> raiddev                 /dev/md0
>         raid-level              1
>         nr-raid-disks           2
>         nr-spare-disks          0
>         chunk-size              128
>         device                  /dev/sda2
>         raid-disk               0
> 
>         device                  /dev/sdb2
>         raid-disk               1
> 
> # /var
> raiddev                 /dev/md1
>         raid-level              1
>         nr-raid-disks           2
>         nr-spare-disks          0
>         chunk-size              128
> 
>         device                  /dev/sda3
>         raid-disk               0
> 
>         device                  /dev/sdb3
>         raid-disk               1
> 
> # /tmp
> raiddev                 /dev/md2
>         raid-level              1
>         nr-raid-disks           2
>         nr-spare-disks          0
>         chunk-size              128
> 
>         device                  /dev/sda5
>         raid-disk               0
> 
>         device                  /dev/sdb5
>         raid-disk               1
> 
> # /usr
> raiddev                 /dev/md3
>         raid-level              1
>         nr-raid-disks           2
>         nr-spare-disks          0
>         chunk-size              128
>         device                  /dev/sda6
>         raid-disk               0
> 
>         device                  /dev/sdb6
>         raid-disk               1
> 
> # /usr/local
> raiddev                 /dev/md4
>         raid-level              1
>         nr-raid-disks           2
>         nr-spare-disks          0
>         chunk-size              128
> 
>         device                  /dev/sda7
>         raid-disk               0
> 
>         device                  /dev/sdb7
>         raid-disk               1
> 
> # /home
> raiddev                 /dev/md5
>         raid-level              1
>         nr-raid-disks           2
>         nr-spare-disks          0
>         chunk-size              128
> 
>         device                  /dev/sda8
>         raid-disk               0
> 
>         device                  /dev/sdb8
>         raid-disk               1
> 
> - -- /proc/mdstat
> 
> Personalities : [raid1] 
> read_ahead 1024 sectors
> md0 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 264960 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] 530048 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> md2 : active raid1 sdb5[1] sda5[0] 200704 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> md3 : active raid1 sdb6[1] sda6[0] 1052160 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> md4 : active raid1 sdb7[1] sda7[0] 5180800 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> md5 : active raid1 sdb8[1] sda8[0] 1052160 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> unused devices: <none>
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]      | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/
> 
> "There is no worse tyranny than to make a man pay for something he does
> not want merely because you think it would be good for him." 
> - -Benjamin Franklin
> 
> All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
> PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> 
> iQCVAwUBNx4cOTM3jpXy1kJtAQHOewP/Vn6TGf7/H9KZDX4COJ69zxKQEouMYdbx
> fbneOpQvW9tUWWUmoJP6Devg93tZRsGw+r2GTjccLKzyWFhFrKyD8UewrnTk95ax
> QyJfXGvXV+UHHHJoURotWeXv87ZRJv2LhrZvD0bw0W076Ta/K1g+Bg/+YARZTsai
> NiCm827B9Vs=
> =C7lx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

Reply via email to