> Hal asked for this, and I agree. It is just lazy not to check the > underlying device type for this stuff - they are different number > spaces, administered by different bodies with no apparent > coordination. > > The IBA is pretty clear what should happen to process an unsupported class > version and and adding OPA shouldn't suddenly make the IB side > non-conformant, however aesthetically unpleasing the code may be.
Are there checks to ensure that MADs not supported by RoCE aren't processed on RoCE ports? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
