> > > The IBA is pretty clear what should happen to process an unsupported > class > > > version and and adding OPA shouldn't suddenly make the IB side > > > non-conformant, however aesthetically unpleasing the code may be. > > > > Are there checks to ensure that MADs not supported by RoCE aren't > > processed on RoCE ports? > > RoCE isn't different, it uses the same numbering space and rules as > IB.
I was agreeing with the point made about non-compliance. RoCE only supports a subset of IB management, and AFAIK, there are no checks to validate MADs received over a RoCE port. Those should be added. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
