On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
<[email protected]> wrote:

> No to the pointer idea.

can you spare few words why?

And if you have a valid argument, as Christoph said they teach in
cache 101 course which he's pretty sure I skipped as twenty other
courses taken by kernel developers, put the no pointer member @ the
end

> I have a slight preference toward ibdev->foo to match other subsystems.

I have a slight preference to keep the struct ib_device_attr notion to
match other portions of the RDMA stack such as the UAPI and the user
space API to applications.

> I have no idea why you care so much about something so trivial.

I don't care so much, I have the small right to speak without getting
so much mud on my head.

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to