On 11:23 Mon 02 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 18:16 Fri 30 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > >> Because a PMA implementation which follows the IBA recommendation will > >> reject this > > > > Hmm, where did you find such recommendation where stated that if > > reserved bits are not '0' the request should be rejected (I would rather > > expect ignoring of those values at all)? > > I sent a subsequent email indicating there was an errata on this and > that these changes are needed.
Let me understand correctly. Do you mean that proposed patch is not needed? Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
