On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11:23 Mon 02 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 18:16 Fri 30 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> >> >> >> Because a PMA implementation which follows the IBA recommendation will >> >> reject this >> > >> > Hmm, where did you find such recommendation where stated that if >> > reserved bits are not '0' the request should be rejected (I would rather >> > expect ignoring of those values at all)? >> >> I sent a subsequent email indicating there was an errata on this and >> that these changes are needed. > > Let me understand correctly. Do you mean that proposed patch is not > needed?
Yes, it's not strictly required and you typically nix those sorts of things. -- Hal > > Sasha > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
