On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18:59 Fri 06 Nov , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: >> On 09:42 Wed 04 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> > >> > When --details selected, if PortCounters has transmit discards, then >> > query PortXmitDiscardDetails. On reset, if --details is selected, then >> > PortXmitDiscardDetails will also be reset. >> > >> > Unfortunately, PortSamplesControl:OptionMask can't be trusted to determine >> > which PortXmitDiscardDetails counters are supported so an option was added >> > for this. >> >> Interesting... Why so? Is it any bug in existing hw? Which one? > > Could you elaborate?
I don't think this is the forum to discuss vendor bugs. -- Hal > > Sasha > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
