On 09:43 Fri 13 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 18:59 Fri 06 Nov , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > >> On 09:42 Wed 04 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > > >> > When --details selected, if PortCounters has transmit discards, then > >> > query PortXmitDiscardDetails. On reset, if --details is selected, then > >> > PortXmitDiscardDetails will also be reset. > >> > > >> > Unfortunately, PortSamplesControl:OptionMask can't be trusted to > >> > determine > >> > which PortXmitDiscardDetails counters are supported so an option was > >> > added > >> > for this. > >> > >> Interesting... Why so? Is it any bug in existing hw? Which one? > > > > Could you elaborate? > > I don't think this is the forum to discuss vendor bugs.
Really? If so why did you post patch here which workarounds something that you don't want to describe? I think that it is important for developers to be aware about existing bugs which may require workarounds. Guess that this is also important for vendors since they likely want to have working products. Anyway don't expect that next time I will apply things blindly. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
