On 06:23 Wed 09 Jun , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> opensm/opensm/osm_sa.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > >> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa.c > >> index 0aca81f..8325632 100644 > >> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa.c > >> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa.c > >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > >> * Copyright (c) 2002-2010 Mellanox Technologies LTD. All rights reserved. > >> * Copyright (c) 1996-2003 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > >> * Copyright (c) 2008 Xsigo Systems Inc. All rights reserved. > >> + * Copyright (c) 2010 HNR Consulting. All rights reserved. > >> * > >> * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two > >> * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU > >> @@ -454,8 +455,15 @@ void osm_sa_respond(osm_sa_t *sa, osm_madw_t *madw, > >> size_t attr_size, > >> /* C15-0.1.5 - always return SM_Key = 0 (table 185 p 884) */ > >> resp_sa_mad->sm_key = 0; > >> > >> - /* Fill in the offset (paylen will be done by the rmpp SAR) */ > >> - resp_sa_mad->attr_offset = num_rec ? ib_get_attr_offset(attr_size) : > >> 0; > >> +#ifdef DUAL_SIDED_RMPP > >> + if (resp_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GETTABLE_RESP || > >> + resp_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GETMULTI_RESP) { > >> +#else > >> + if (resp_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GETTABLE_RESP) { > >> +#endif > >> + /* Fill in the offset (paylen will be done by the rmpp SAR) > >> */ > >> + resp_sa_mad->attr_offset = num_rec ? > >> ib_get_attr_offset(attr_size) : 0; > >> + } > > > > What is wrong with current implementation? > > It's now needed for the debug version of OpenSM not to assert due to: > > 7fc6cd3037f07190e483a047f17d37b6bebbb2b3 > Author: Smith, Stan <[email protected]> > Date: Fri May 21 10:49:27 2010 -0700 > > ib_types.h add debug assert > > Add a debug assert to catch incorrect MAD attr offset size. > This proved to be useful in catching incorrect struct sizes as MAD attrs > nee > d to be a multiple of 8 bytes. > > Signed-off-by: stan smith <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> > > as not all SA attributes are multiple of 8 bytes.
Then it seems that such assertion is incorrect and the patch should be reverted. Right? Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
