<snip...> Following discussion is tangential to Hal's patch.
Last night I came across an curious discovery. sizeof(ib_inform_info_t) == 36. sizeof(ib_inform_info_record_t) == 64. My debug version of 'osmtest -f v' trips CL_ASSERT() in ib_get_attr_offset() osmteset.c::osmtest_informinfo_request()for ib_get_attr_offset(rec), where rec is ib_inform_info_t. The winOFED ib_types.h & OFED ib_types.h match w.r.t. definitions for ib_inform_info_t & ib_inform_info_record_t. Question: should ib_inform_info_t be 8-bye aligned with padding in ib_inform_info_record_t adjusted or should we remove the CL_ASSERT() from ib_get_attr_offset()? stan. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
