> > There's a ai_qp_type field available. I think the RDMA TCP port > > space would work. > > Not sure the port space matters at all? > > Is there anything additional CM information for XRC other than > requesting an XRC QP type? (XRCSRQ or something?)
It's nothing huge: Modifications to Table 99: * Responder Resources field, Values column: 0 for XRC * Transport Service Type field, Description column: See Section 14.6.3.1 Transport Service Type. * Retry Count field, Values column: 0 for XRC * RNR Retry Count field, Values column: 0 for XRC * SRQ field, Values column: 0 for XRC * Change (reserved) field at position byte 51, bit 5 to: * Field: Extended Transport Type * Description: See Section 14.6.3.2 Extended Transport Type * Used for Purpose: C * Byte [Bit] Offset: 51 [5] * Length, Bits: 3 Modifications to Table 103: * Initiator Depth field, Values column: 0 for XRC * End-to-End Flow Control field, Values column: 0 for XRC * SRQ field, Values column: 1 for XRC But should still be set correctly. - Sean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
