On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:59:46 -0700
Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> > "need"; I guess not. But I thought it was odd that the information was
> > different for the 2 query methods. There is nothing in the documentation
> > or help output which indicates the output would be different.
> >
> > That said I do see what you mean regarding the amount of data
> > returned. I figured most users were probably grepping this output
> > anyway, as on a large fabric both methods return a sizable amount of
> > data.
>
> One is supposed to return de-duplicated information about the groups
> that exist, the other was supposed to show group member information.
[caveat]
I am not trying to beat a dead horse...
[/caveat]
I guess it depends on what you define as "member info" and what that implies to
the user. ("de-duplicated" or not.)
-m get multicast member info. If a group is specified, limit the
output to the group specified
and print one line containing only the GUID and node description
for each entry. Example:
saquery -m 0xc000
To me this implied "de-duplication" only occurred with the mlid specified.
But.. I'm happy.
Ira
>
> Jason
--
Ira Weiny
Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
925-423-8008
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
