Hi Hal, On 19:37 Wed 13 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Rather than memcmp'ing the entire field, compare the two fields ignoring the > reserved field (which may some day be used). This makes SMs coded this > way better handle such a future spec expansion. > > This change also gets this code closer to supporting M_KeyProtectBits. > > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> > ---
Applied. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
