Thanks Ira,

My apologies for not following the conventional standard.  Should I generate a 
new patch?

-k

On Oct 12, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:

> I think this is a reasonable idea.
> 
> Comment on the patch.
> 
> -     OSM_EVENT_ID_MAX
> +     OSM_EVENT_ID_MAX,
> +     OSM_EVENT_ID_LIGHT_SWEEP_START, 
> +     OSM_EVENT_ID_LIGHT_SWEEP_DONE,  
> 
> Traditionally the "MAX" value in the enum is kept at the end.
> 
> Ira
> 
> 
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:31:07 -0700
> Karl Schulz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Would it be possible to consider exposing light-sweep events to the current 
>> OpenSM plugin interface?  Something along the lines of the attached patch is 
>> what we are using locally against opensm-3.3.9.
>> 
>> The motivation is to support a plugin module we have written to expose 
>> topology information to a query service which can be used by MPI stacks (in 
>> user-space) for topology-aware optimization and for topology-aware 
>> scheduling via batch systems. 
>> 
>> Thanks for the consideration,
>> 
>> Karl
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ira Weiny
> Member of Technical Staff
> Lawrence Livermore National Lab
> 925-423-8008
> [email protected]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to