From: Or Gerlitz <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:49:43 +0200

> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Or Gerlitz <[email protected]>
> 
>>> Hi Dave, for correct operation / future bisection, you should 1st
>>> apply Roland's patch which reduces the hard header len advertized by
>>> ipoib to be only the size of the ipoib header without that 20 bytes
>>> headroom, else the gro memcmp will be issued on the ipoib header and
>>> then 20 bytes of the ip header, kind of back to square one...
> 
>> I did.
> 
> Yep, I missed your earlier response to Roland's patch. So a question
> here, how would you recommend to get that out... since the fix for the
> problem includes two patches to core networking and one patch to
> ipoib, we can't just ship a patch to ipoib which people can apply
> build against their kernels. You've placed this work in net-next and
> not net, so I assume we should wait for 3.4-rc1 and then push to
> -stable? any other method to use here that you can recommend? thanks,

I don't think this is an appropriate bug fix at all.

Apparently this problem has existed since day one and the world has
kept on spinning meanwhile.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to