> > Previously we had agreed to use a new send_flag , IBV_SEND_EXTENDED, > > which would indicate the presence of the extended data structure. > > With new functionality, there may also be new extended opcodes, but > > this is not a requirement. > > I think that's fine.
So are you are OK with this option ? There were 2 options, and this one is our preference. Remove the pointer to the ibv_send_wr_ext pointer from the wr union in ibv_send_wr, and put the ibv_send_wr (less the duplicated data structures) after the union, with the usual comp_mask flag to indicate what is supported. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
