> > So are you are OK with this option ? There were 2 options, and this > > one is our preference. > > > > Remove the pointer to the ibv_send_wr_ext pointer from the wr union > > in ibv_send_wr, and put the ibv_send_wr (less the duplicated data > > structures) after the union, with the usual comp_mask flag to > > indicate what is supported. > > As long as it's compatible, yes.
Sounds good - thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
