On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26:47AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > >> Let’s take this as a starting point. If there are other patches > >> people think should make 4.1, please bring them to my attention and > >> I’ll add them for review and possible addition to the list. > >> > >> git://github.com/dledford/linux.git for-4.1 > > > > I noticed a few patches didn't get Reviewed-By's etc from the mailing > > list annotated.. > > Every patch need not have a Reviewed-By annotation, it's perfectly up > to the maintainer judgement to make sure there was either consensus,
More clearly: There were several patches where a Reviewed-By/etc was *provided* on-list but did not get captured in the git commit. AFAIK, capturing provided tags is considered best practice as a way to recognize and retain contributors. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
