On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 15:37 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26:47AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > > > >> Let’s take this as a starting point. If there are other patches > > >> people think should make 4.1, please bring them to my attention and > > >> I’ll add them for review and possible addition to the list. > > >> > > >> git://github.com/dledford/linux.git for-4.1 > > > > > > I noticed a few patches didn't get Reviewed-By's etc from the mailing > > > list annotated.. > > > > Every patch need not have a Reviewed-By annotation, it's perfectly up > > to the maintainer judgement to make sure there was either consensus, > > More clearly: There were several patches where a Reviewed-By/etc was > *provided* on-list but did not get captured in the git commit.
Sure, that's what I figured you meant. That most likely means that I pulled the bundle from patchworks before their review was captured. It means I would need to either re-pull the bundle or manually add the review. > AFAIK, capturing provided tags is considered best practice as a way to > recognize and retain contributors. Agreed. I'll double check them tomorrow. -- Doug Ledford <[email protected]> GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
