On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:33:18PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:10:45AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > >> Jason, ping, it's fair to require that if you made a review argument > >> against > >> the design done here and we've responded about a week ago, saying why > >> this design is valid (e.g goes along the 10y old IB stack udata mechanism > >> and > >> such) -- you would comment on the response and not leave it in the air. > > > > Was it not clear? Yann and I asked to see the user space side before > > reviewing this series further. > > Jason, you (U2 BTW) play really, really hard - refusing to say **one** > word on your approach towards the built-in udata mechanism for uverbs > which I asked you to comment on.
And I asked to see the user space side and you have angrily refused every time. So I guess we are both playing hard. FWIW, your comments on udata seemed compelling, but I want to see the whole solution before saying I'm OK with it. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
