On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:33:58AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > (2) instantly rejecting a usage of a mechanism existing just for that > use case since the first year of our life (2005)
I didn't reject anything, I said I wanted to see the user side to continue my review. > This series is (1) simple compared to other stuff being reviewed here > nowadays, What? It is 11 patches, long, introduces several UAPI changes, does not implement a standardized feature, adds new uses of latent kernel functions and exists to support a unique feature of a single hardware vendor that few understand the usecase for. I would describe this as one of the toughest to review series on patchworks right now. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
