> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hefty, Sean [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:04 PM
> To: Jason Gunthorpe; Steve Wise
> Cc: 'Sagi Grimberg'; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; infinipath;
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 4/5] RDMA/iser: support iWARP devices
> 
> > > I prefer to decouple the iSER changes with this core work.
> > > Jason/Sean... thoughts?  I could do the iSER w/o patch 3, and the
> > > follow up with a series that includes our final solution on
> > > transport independent memory registration and change all the TI
> > > kernel users (iser and nfsrdma) along with it.
> >
> > There has a been a big push lately to drop the strange transport
> > specific stuff - if you are comitted to seeing the access flag clean
> > up series through then I don't see a problem with using whatever order
> > you like.
> 
> I agree.

Ok, then I'll do this:

1) series with iser changes to enable iwarp including mlx/ipath/qib patches to 
set max_sge_rd
2) series on transport independent access flags / memory reg - updating the 
kernel ULPs too.

Thanks,

Steve.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to