> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sagi Grimberg [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:26 AM
> To: Steve Wise; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] RDMA/iser: support iWARP devices
> 
> On 6/30/2015 12:36 AM, Steve Wise wrote:
> > Limit the sg tablesize based on the device fast reg depth.
> >
> > Use rdma_get_dma_mr() to allocate the DMA MR.
> >
> > Use rdma_fast_reg_access_flags() to set the access_flags for fast
> > register work requests.
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I wander if it would make more sense to get the iser/isert stuff in
> without the mr stuff (I'd like the mr to go in a different direction).
> 
> Whatever you prefer.
>

I prefer to decouple the iSER changes with this core work.  Jason/Sean... 
thoughts?   I could do the iSER w/o patch 3, and the follow up with a series 
that includes our final solution on transport independent memory registration 
and change all the TI kernel users (iser and nfsrdma) along with it.

Steve.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to