On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:28:11AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:50:05PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> > 
> > nice you got it working with upstream! Thanks. It still looks a bit too
> > much like BSP code, though, so we need to clean it up. I found 'git log
> > --grep=tuning drivers/mmc/host' to be useful to get an idea of current
> > best practices.
> > 
> > > + bool (*inquiry_tuning)(struct tmio_mmc_host *host);
> > 
> > Do we really need this? I'd think the core will check that tuning only
> > gets called when needed.
> 
> Thanks, I'll look into that and in general updating the approach taken
> to tuning to reflect that currently taken in mainline.

[...]

> > Note to self: this is copied from sdhci.c
> 
> It also seems to be copied from an old version of sdhci.c.
> So at the very least there seem some updates to be incorporated. 

On closer inspection I don't think that the loop in sdhci_execute_tuning()
implements the correct logic for the R-Car SCC. I'll look into reworking
it accordingly.

Reply via email to