On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote: > While the patch is acceptable as-is, my question is still valid: > Is there any specific reason you chose scif1 over hscif1?
Conservatism. :) CU Uli
- [PATCH v2 0/7] Renesas *SCIF* RX FIFO support Ulrich Hecht
- [PATCH v2 4/7] serial: sh-sci: increase RX FIFO tr... Ulrich Hecht
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] serial: sh-sci: increase RX... Geert Uytterhoeven
- [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7796: salvator-x: ad... Ulrich Hecht
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7796: salvat... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7796: sa... Ulrich Hecht
- [PATCH v2 1/7] serial: sh-sci: add FIFO trigger bi... Ulrich Hecht
- [PATCH v2 6/7] serial: sh-sci: make RX FIFO parame... Ulrich Hecht
- Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] serial: sh-sci: make RX FIF... Geert Uytterhoeven
- [PATCH v2 3/7] serial: sh-sci: implement FIFO thre... Ulrich Hecht
- [PATCH v2 5/7] serial: sh-sci: SCIFA/B RX FIFO sof... Ulrich Hecht
- [PATCH v2 2/7] serial: sh-sci: consider DR (data r... Ulrich Hecht
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] serial: sh-sci: consider DR... Geert Uytterhoeven
