> instead of changing this "1" to "scl"? Same-same, but it looks odd
> to use scl as argument to sda (at least without that comment about
> sda following scl that is present inside the loop below).
> 
> At the same time, your version make the code inside the loop the
> same as this initializing code. Oh well, your call...

Yes, I wanted them to look alike. Yet, I agree to your comment about
moving the comment. Will update.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to