Hi Niklas,

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> From: Masaharu Hayakawa <[email protected]>
> 
> Checking for SCC error during retuning is unnecessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masaharu Hayakawa <[email protected]>
> [Niklas: fix small style issue]
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> * Changes since v2
> - Added check for HS400 as it's now merged.
> - Added tags from Wolfram.
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c 
> b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> index 777e32b0e410e850..a21b347424f67c52 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> @@ -444,6 +444,14 @@ static bool renesas_sdhi_check_scc_error(struct 
> tmio_mmc_host *host)
>  {
>       struct renesas_sdhi *priv = host_to_priv(host);
>  
> +     if (!(host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104) &&
> +         !(host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200) &&
> +         !(host->mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400))

According to the BSP this needs to differentiate between 4tap and 8tap
variants of HS400 support.

> +             return false;
> +
> +     if (host->mmc->doing_retune)
> +             return false;
> +
>       /* Check SCC error */
>       if (sd_scc_read32(host, priv, SH_MOBILE_SDHI_SCC_RVSCNTL) &
>           SH_MOBILE_SDHI_SCC_RVSCNTL_RVSEN &&
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

Reply via email to