Hi Geert, On Thursday, July 26, 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Thanks for your series! > > Unfortunately Greg has already applied your v1 (and my fix for a > use-after-free), so either these have to be reverted first, or you have to > rebase against tty-next.
I assume you would prefer the newer implementation I did. In your opinion, which one would be better (revert or rebase)? Thanks, Chris
