Hi Eugeniu,

On 05/08/18 00:11, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> According to R-Car Gen3 HW manual rev0.55E, R-Car M3-N has two CAN

rev 0.55E sounds like rather an old version of this document. Do you
have access to the later rev1.00 release?

(Not an issue for this patch itself, I can confirm that revision 1.00
still confirms M3-N CAN support)

> interfaces, similar to H3, M3-W and other SoCs from the same family.
> 
> Add CAN nodes to avoid below r8a77965-ulcb-kf.dtb build failure:
> Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/ulcb-kf.dtsi:19.1-6 Label or path can0 not 
> found
> Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/ulcb-kf.dtsi:25.1-6 Label or path can1 not 
> found

Again, this is somewhat referencing the future, as (in patch sequence)
the file "r8a77965-ulcb-kf.dts" does not yet exist, so does not really
need to be mentioned here.


> CAN support is inspired from below commits:
>  - v4.7 commit 308b7e4ba62e ("arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CAN support")
>  - v4.11 commit 909c16252415 ("arm64: dts: r8a7796: Add CAN support")
>  - v4.12 commit bec0948e810f ("arm64: dts: r8a7796: Add reset control 
> properties")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <ero...@de.adit-jv.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi | 32 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> index 486aecacb22a..cb8f8573d9ef 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> @@ -656,6 +656,38 @@
>                       status = "disabled";
>               };
>  
> +             can0: can@e6c30000 {
> +                     compatible = "renesas,can-r8a77965",
> +                                  "renesas,rcar-gen3-can";
> +                     reg = <0 0xe6c30000 0 0x1000>;
> +                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 186 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                     clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 916>,
> +                            <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A77965_CLK_CANFD>,
> +                            <&can_clk>;
> +                     clock-names = "clkp1", "clkp2", "can_clk";
> +                     assigned-clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A77965_CLK_CANFD>;
> +                     assigned-clock-rates = <40000000>;

This doesn't look right. Sections 52A.2 has a note stating:

CANFD? must be set as follows.
R-Car H3, R-Car M3-W, R-Car M3-N, R-Car V3M, R-Car V3H, R-Car E3: 80 (MHz)

R-Car D3: 40 (MHz)


Could you verify / check in case this value should be 80MHz?

> +                     power-domains = <&sysc R8A77965_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> +                     resets = <&cpg 916>;
> +                     status = "disabled";
> +             };
> +
> +             can1: can@e6c38000 {
> +                     compatible = "renesas,can-r8a77965",
> +                                  "renesas,rcar-gen3-can";
> +                     reg = <0 0xe6c38000 0 0x1000>;
> +                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 187 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                     clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 915>,
> +                            <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A77965_CLK_CANFD>,
> +                            <&can_clk>;
> +                     clock-names = "clkp1", "clkp2", "can_clk";
> +                     assigned-clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A77965_CLK_CANFD>;
> +                     assigned-clock-rates = <40000000>;

Same here of course.


> +                     power-domains = <&sysc R8A77965_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> +                     resets = <&cpg 915>;
> +                     status = "disabled";
> +             };
> +
>               pwm0: pwm@e6e30000 {
>                       compatible = "renesas,pwm-r8a77965", "renesas,pwm-rcar";
>                       reg = <0 0xe6e30000 0 8>;
> 

Reply via email to