On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 02:24:41PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Kazufumi Ikeda <[email protected]>
> 
> Reestablish the PCIe link very early in the resume process in case it
> went down to prevent PCI accesses from hanging the bus. Such accesses
> can happen early in the PCI resume process, in the resume_noirq, thus
> the link must be reestablished in the resume_noirq callback of the
> driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kazufumi Ikeda <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> Cc: Phil Edworthy <[email protected]>
> Cc: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> V2: - Use BIT() macro for (1 << n)
>     - Since polling in rcar_pcie_wait_for_dl() uses udelay(), do not
>       add extra changes to this function anymore
>     - Make resume_noirq return early and clean up parenthesis therein
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> index c8febb009454..b8f8fb3bc640 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>  
>  /* Transfer control */
>  #define PCIETCTLR            0x02000
> +#define  DL_DOWN             BIT(3)
>  #define  CFINIT                      1

I saw discussion after the V1 patch about using BIT() and making
similar constants also use BIT() for consistency.  That makes sense to
me, and I think the best way would be:

  1) in *this* patch, use "#define DL_DOWN 8"
  2) in a followup patch, convert them all to BIT()

That way each revision of pcie-rcar.c is self-consistent.

>  #define PCIETSTR             0x02004
>  #define  DATA_LINK_ACTIVE    1
> @@ -1130,6 +1131,7 @@ static int rcar_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
>  
>       pcie->dev = dev;
> +     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
>  
>       err = pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges(dev, &pcie->resources, NULL);
>       if (err)
> @@ -1221,10 +1223,28 @@ static int rcar_pcie_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int rcar_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct rcar_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +     if (rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PMSR) &&
> +         !(rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIETCTLR) & DL_DOWN))
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     /* Re-establish the PCIe link */
> +     rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, CFINIT, PCIETCTLR);
> +     return rcar_pcie_wait_for_dl(pcie);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops rcar_pcie_pm_ops = {
> +     .resume_noirq = rcar_pcie_resume_noirq,
> +};

I think there's the beginning of a convention to use #ifdef
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP around the ops themselves [1].  Otherwise I think
we'll get a warning about unused code when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is unset.

>  static struct platform_driver rcar_pcie_driver = {
>       .driver = {
>               .name = "rcar-pcie",
>               .of_match_table = rcar_pcie_of_match,
> +             .pm = &rcar_pcie_pm_ops,
>               .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>       },
>       .probe = rcar_pcie_probe,
> -- 
> 2.19.2
> 

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]

Reply via email to