Hi Marek,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 1:56 AM <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@gmail.com>
>
> Replace unsigned long with u32 in register accessor functions,
> since they access 32bit registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@gmail.com>
Thanks for your patch!
Minor nit below.
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
BTW, there are a few more suspicious/incorrect uses of unsigned long:
- incorrect debug prints on arm64,
- more unsigned long register values,
- phys_addr_t
Care to fix these as well?
Thanks!
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -152,14 +152,12 @@ struct rcar_pcie {
> struct rcar_msi msi;
> };
>
> -static void rcar_pci_write_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie, unsigned long val,
> - unsigned long reg)
> +static void rcar_pci_write_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
Doesn't unsigned int make more sense for reg?
> {
> writel(val, pcie->base + reg);
> }
>
> -static unsigned long rcar_pci_read_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
> - unsigned long reg)
> +static u32 rcar_pci_read_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
Likewise.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
