On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 03:20:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:56 PM Simon Horman <[email protected]> 
> wrote:

...

> 
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> > @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@
> >                         power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_CA57_CPU0>;
> >                         next-level-cache = <&L2_CA57>;
> >                         enable-method = "psci";
> > +                       dynamic-power-coefficient = <854>;
> 
> The dynamic-power-coefficient property is a property of the CPU,
> documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml,
> and not directly related to thermal zones.
> 
> Hence I think its addition should be done in a separate patch.

Sure, can do. Should the coefficient be added to each CPU or only
to a57_0 and a53_0, as is the case in this patch?

I assume the latter because the A53 coefficient applies to all A53 cores
and likewise for A57.

> >                         clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7795_CLK_Z>;
> >                         operating-points-v2 = <&cluster0_opp>;
> >                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
> > @@ -207,6 +208,8 @@
> >                         power-domains = <&sysc R8A7795_PD_CA53_CPU0>;
> >                         next-level-cache = <&L2_CA53>;
> >                         enable-method = "psci";
> > +                       #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > +                       dynamic-power-coefficient = <277>;
> 
> Likewise.
> 
> >                         clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7795_CLK_Z2>;
> >                         operating-points-v2 = <&cluster1_opp>;
> >                         capacity-dmips-mhz = <535>;
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> -- 
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- 
> [email protected]
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like 
> that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
> 

Reply via email to