Dear Maintainers, >> >> plat-samsung would probably be fine for that also - create a file called >> >> common-smdk or something. Some other things have gone for a plat-smdk >> >> style approach too, though I'm not sure how tasteful I find that >> >> personally. >> > Even though I would personally like to have EPLL control for a device >> > in machine specific manner as part of its driver, I accept your opinion. >> > >> > Claude, let us create one arch/arm/plat-samsung/smdk.c to do common >> > stuff for SMKDs like EPLL control. What do you think ? >> >> Actually if we add this file on plat-samsung, board-init will be >> separated two-part, one is machine(board) specific and other is all >> smdk specific. So, If it doesn't make confusion to other guys who >> wants to add settings for their features on board-init, it looks good >> to me. But I think that we also have to listen Mr. Ben Dooks and Mr. >> Kukjin Kim's opinion about this before we get a conclusion. > > Hi all, > > I think, basically it'd better if could control clock stuff in each driver > for it when need it such as clk_get, clk_enable and so on. > Actually there is no policy/protection for EPLL usage in plat-samsung or > plat-s5p now and need to sort out other similar case for it also....so in my > opinion, right now to proceed with the current style is helpful to me and > will consider it in the future. >
I wander to know that this is a last discussion, or more, and also know about finial decision. Of course, if we didn't get reached to the conclusion, we can talk more. Can you give me a hand to finish this? :-) with Best Regards, Claude -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
