Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 2:16 PM Sangbeom Kim wrote: > > > From: Daein Moon <[email protected]> > > > > This patch adds support SROMC for S5PV310 and S5PC210. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daein Moon <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c | 5 ++ > > arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/map.h | 4 ++ > > arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/regs-srom.h | 50 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/include/mach/regs-srom.h > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c > > index ffed262..873783a 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c > > @@ -81,6 +81,11 @@ static struct map_desc s5pv310_iodesc[] __initdata = > { > > .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S3C_PA_UART), > > .length = SZ_512K, > > .type = MT_DEVICE, > > + }, { > > + .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SROMC, > > + .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(S5PV310_PA_SROMC), > > + .length = SZ_4K, > > + .type = MT_DEVICE, > > }, > > }; > > Do You really need to make a permanent mapping for the SROMC area? Cannot the > setup code in the mach-smdk*.c call ioremap(S5PV310_PA_SROMC) and put the address it > got to the ethernet device? This area will be probably useless for boards other than > SMDK. > Hi,
It seems to be useless because only ethernet device uses the SROM interface. Will this mapping be ready for devices that will use the SROM interface in boards other than SMDK? Best regards, Daein Moon > <snip> > > Best regards > -- > Marek Szyprowski > Samsung Poland R&D Center > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
