On 12/13/2011 11:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 23:33 +0200, Denis Kuzmenko wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 11:28 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> The LEDF_ACTLOW use is dependent on it being #defined
>>> to 1 when using ^.  I think that's unintelligible.
>> Sorry, can't understand. Can you please clarify last two sentences?
> 
>       s3c2410_gpio_setpin(pd->gpio, (value ? 1 : 0) ^
>                           (pd->flags & S3C24XX_LEDF_ACTLOW));
> 
> I think this should be:
>       s3c2410_gpio_setpin(pd->gpio,
>                           !!value ^ !!(pd->flags & S3C24XX_LEDF_ACTLOW));
> 

So you've found a BUG. As I understand my code will behave wrong if
S3C24XX_LEDF_ACTLOW value will be changed.
Thank you, I'll make a new version.

-- 
Best regards, Denis Kuzmenko.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to