Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: > > This patch adds platform drm-device node to the dtsi file > > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > index 6401c94..f0cc06d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > @@ -495,4 +495,8 @@ > reg = <0x14400000 0x40000>; > interrupts = <18 5>, <18 4>, <18 6>; > }; > + > + drm-device { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos-drm-device"; > + }; > }; > --
Please check below comments from Thomas Abraham and I agree with his opinion. There cannot be a node that represents a virtual device. Device tree should ideally describe the hardware but the above node does not represent a hardware device. The creation of the platform device instance for the above device should handled inside the kernel code. Thanks. K-Gene <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
