Hi, On Wednesday 26 of September 2012 10:46:01 Kukjin Kim wrote: > Please check below comments from Thomas Abraham and I agree with his > opinion. > > There cannot be a node that represents a virtual device. Device tree > should ideally describe the hardware but the above node does not > represent a hardware device. The creation of the platform device > instance for the above device should handled inside the kernel code.
I don't tend to agree with this opinion. Is there any further reasoning behind it? Is it a current policy of the kernel that nodes should only represent real devices? Best regards, Tomasz Figa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
