On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 17:00 -0800, Andy Grover wrote: > On 12/16/2013 01:40 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:59 -0800, Andy Grover wrote: > >> Instead of an array, use a rbtree. Less memory use on average, and > >> can allow >255 entries. We go from O(1) to O(log n) on lookups. If this > >> shows up on profiling (it won't) then transition to other kernel lookup > >> methods is straightforward from here. > >> > > > > Ugh. > > > > There is no reason to be using rbtrees in a performance critical path > > here. > > > > The number of pointer lookups is what ends up hurting the most vs. a > > flat array, so given that 256 LUNs per endpoint is currently not an > > issue, and there is no hard limit on the number of endpoints with > > virtual addressing, I don't see the benefit of this patch. > > > > NAK. > > What does virtual addressing mean in this context? I'm not familiar -- > so instead of reporting 257+ luns per tpg, it would get split up somehow?
Virtual addressing meaning /sys/kernel/config/target/$FABRIC/$WWPN/ endpoints that are not tied to a specific hardware mapping, so any arbitrary number of $WWPNs can be created. Right now the only use-case where people are using more than a few dozen LUNs per endpoint is with non NPIV qla2xxx mode, where a single physical Fibre Channel WWPN is exporting 256-512 LUNs, with different per NodeACL LUN mappings for different initiators. With NPIV mode for qla2xxx (currently in development), the WWPN becomes virtualized like iSCSI, and a unsigned short about of virtual port addresses can be configured per physical FC port. --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
