On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 08:37:39AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Track attached SCSI devices and update the 'access_state' field
> whenever an ALUA state change has been detected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> index 6c6ff0b..d01c86407 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi_proto.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi_dbg.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi_eh.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi_dh.h>
> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *kaluad_wq;
>  struct alua_port_group {
>       struct kref             kref;
>       struct list_head        node;
> +     struct list_head        dh_list;
>       unsigned char           device_id_str[256];
>       int                     device_id_len;
>       int                     group_id;
> @@ -93,6 +95,7 @@ struct alua_port_group {
>  };
>  
>  struct alua_dh_data {
> +     struct list_head        node;
>       struct alua_port_group  *pg;
>       int                     rel_port;
>       spinlock_t              pg_lock;
> @@ -243,6 +246,7 @@ struct alua_port_group *alua_get_pg(struct scsi_device 
> *sdev,
>       INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&pg->rtpg_work, alua_rtpg_work);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pg->rtpg_list);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pg->node);
> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pg->dh_list);
>       spin_lock_init(&pg->lock);
>  
>       /* Re-check list again to catch concurrent updates */
> @@ -370,13 +374,26 @@ static int alua_check_vpd(struct scsi_device *sdev, 
> struct alua_dh_data *h,
>               old_pg = pg;
>               /* port_group has changed. Update to new port group */
>               if (h->pg != pg) {
> +                     unsigned long flags;
> +
>                       old_pg = h->pg;
>                       rcu_assign_pointer(h->pg, pg);
> +                     spin_lock_irqsave(&old_pg->lock, flags);
> +                     list_del_rcu(&h->node);
> +                     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old_pg->lock, flags);
> +                     spin_lock_irqsave(&pg->lock, flags);
> +                     list_add_rcu(&h->node, &pg->dh_list);
> +                     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pg->lock, flags);

I think it makes more sense to remove it from the old list
before assining the new h->pg pointer to stay consistant.

Also the add code is not common with the other half of the outer
branch, it would be nice to find a way to share the code between
those two branches.

>               list_for_each_entry(tmp_pg, &port_group_list, node) {
> +                     struct alua_dh_data *h;
> +
>                       if (tmp_pg->group_id != group_id)
>                               continue;
>                       if (tmp_pg->device_id_len != pg->device_id_len)
> @@ -639,6 +658,12 @@ static int alua_rtpg(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct 
> alua_port_group *pg)
>                               continue;
>                       tmp_pg->state = desc[0] & 0x0f;
>                       tmp_pg->pref = desc[0] >> 7;
> +                     rcu_read_lock();
> +                     list_for_each_entry_rcu(h, &tmp_pg->dh_list, node) {
> +                             if (h->sdev)
> +                                     h->sdev->access_state = desc[0];
> +                     }
> +                     rcu_read_unlock();

І'd expect h->ѕdev to always be non-NULL.  With a little tweak (see below)
that should indeed be the case.

> @@ -1086,6 +1112,9 @@ static void alua_bus_detach(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>       h->sdev = NULL;
>       spin_unlock(&h->pg_lock);
>       if (pg) {
> +             spin_lock(&pg->lock);
> +             list_del_rcu(&h->node);
> +             spin_unlock(&pg->lock);
>               synchronize_rcu();
>               if (pg->rtpg_sdev)
>                       flush_delayed_work(&pg->rtpg_work);

Here we'd just need to make sure to do the list_del before setting
h->sdev to NULL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to