On 05/30/2017 05:14 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we've seen reports for a crash with an invalid timer_list->function,
> which turned out to be an unsafe usage of libfc discovery callbacks.
> This patchset fixes up the problem
> 
> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.

The patches look good themselves, but I'd prefer a *why* in the commit
message. For instance in patch 1 you have:

"Move 'pending' and 'requested' setting out of fc_disc_gpn_fc_req()
into the calling function.

No functional change."

But why do you need to move the 'pending' and 'requested' settings?

With an a bit more verbose changelog

Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>

for the whole series

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
[email protected]                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

Reply via email to