> > On 09/15/18 23:41, Avri Altman wrote: > >> Since this patch series does not touch any include/uapi header and since no > >> uapi UFS header files already exist, how is user space software expected to > >> know which message format it should use for communicating over the UFS > BSG > >> endpoint? I don't think that "read the source" is an acceptable answer. > > > > I was thinking in V5 to move some of the notations from include/uapi to > ufs_bsg.h. > > Or, I can add a "bsg support" paragraph to Documentation/scsi/ufs.txt, > > Or even a new entry to Documentation/ABI/testing/ - whatever you think is > best? > > Adding a paragraph to Documentation/scsi/ufs.txt sounds like a good idea > to me. Done.
Thanks, Avri > > Thanks, > > Bart.
